M. Guy Verhofstadt
The man of the
L'homme de l'an
De man van het jaar
A proven Democrat, protector and
fighter for justice and human rights in the World.
Een bewezen Democraat, beschermer en strijder voor rechtvaardigheid
en mensenrechten in de Wereld.
Un prouvé démocrate, protecteur et combattant pour la justice et des
droits de l'homme dans le Mond.
Eine bewährte Demokrat, Beschützer und Kämpfer für Gerechtigkeit und
Menschenrechte in der Welt.
zaštitnik i borac za pravdu i ljudska prava u Svijetu.
M. Barak Hossein Obama
peace in the world
vrede in de wereld
la paix dans le monde
Garantie des Friedens in der Welt
mieru vo svete
mira u svijetu
Fógra tábhachtach Nuacht
World Security Network reporting from Oslo in Norway,
July 24, 2011
Dear Cavkic Salih,
The Norwegians are one of my most respected and admired
When others followed a strategy of appeasement after the Nazis
invaded their countries (like most French did), the whole nation
rose up against the occupiers and fought for freedom and liberty
- supported by the Norwegian major and later Mayor of Berlin and
Chancellor of Germany Willy Brandt from Luebeck in Germany.
When the reactionary elements in the Beijing Administration
campaigned hard against the decoration of Chinese dissident Liu
Xiaobo with the prestigious Nobel Peace Price, Oslo stood firm.
I admire the Nobel Peace Prize Institute which pushed and
stimulated so many peace activists for decades (see
Dr. Hubertus Hoffmann: "Nobel Peace Prize: Who deserves it?").
Most Norwegians are down-to-earth, non-materialistic, reliable
and good people - enrichments to our diverse globe.
On July 22, hell came down upon Norway with more than 90
civilians killed, most of whom were teenagers.
Not by radical so-called Islamists or al-Qaeda, but a white
young man from Norway - the devil with blond hair.
It shows us that terrorism is not limited to Islamists but
includes right – wing extremists as well which we find in the
US, Germany or Russia, too.
It reminds me of the bomb attack at the Oktoberfest in Munich in
1980 by a lonely German right-wing extremist killing 13 innocent
Our sympathies are now with the people of Norway and especially
the sad families. Let us pray for them and the victims.
Marie Roksund, WSN Editor Norway, says: "Words are not enough. This tragedy affects each and every citizen in Norway.
Our whole nation is crying. My thoughts go to everyone who lost
their dearly beloved. These innocent young people lost their
lives for what they believed in - freedom, social justice,
democracy and justice. Evil stands alone. Love and hope conquers
all. It is true to say 'You never know how strong you are until
being strong is the only choice you have.'"
Let us promote the
Human Codes of Tolerance and Respect all together to contain
all radical hate preachers whether they are white and blond or colored with a beard.
Join us now!
Norway, please continue with your admirable concept of liberty,
tolerance and freedom!
Dr. Hubertus Hoffmann
President and Founder
World Security Network Foundation
World Security Network reporting from Munich in Germany,
July 05, 2011
Dear Cavkic Salih,
Otto von Habsburg, a
role model for freedom fighters all over the world as well as
for “noblesse oblige”. His legacy is a united Europe of freedom,
justice and Christian values and the will to advance its
development step by step.
On July 3, 2011
Otto von Habsburg, aged 98, passed away at his home at Lake Starnberg
near Munich in Bavaria.
The son of the last Emperor of Austria Karl went into exile with his family
in 1919 and spent several years in Washington DC during World War II, where
he loved to pass his days studying and reading in the Library of Congress
and met another refugee from Europe,
Dr. Fritz Kraemer, who inspired the establishment of the
World Security Network as a global elite network for a safer world.
Otto von Habsburg like Fritz Kramer had an animosity towards the Nazis which
occupied Austria after the “Anschluss” in 1938. Another Austrian-born, Adolf
Hitler, was his counterpart from the 1920’s to 1945. These men represented
opposite worlds: one noble, the other low class, one with all privileges in
high-society, the other homeless, one rooted in deep Christian believes, the
other full of hate - the proletarian dictator and the noble heir.
Returning to Europe after World War II Otto von Habsburg promoted a united
and free Europe including the East, a conviction he would stick to
tirelessly during his long life, rooted in Christianity and democratic
The designated crown prince never complained about loosing the ability to
become emperor of Austria after his home country became a republic. For
legal reasons he was not allowed to return home until 1966 and also lost his
noble title, now simply called “Herr Habsburg”.
He was always noble in his manners, humble and human.
His new “Heimat” and virtual kingdom of hope become the Paneuropa Union,
founded by Richard Graf Coudenhove-Kalergi. From 1973 to 2004 he served as
the International President of this organization. For the conservative CSU
in Bavaria he joined the European Parliament in 1979 and remained active in
the Foreign Affairs Committee until 1999.
For decades too many people in Germany and Europe as well as the media
smiled at him and judged him as a “reactionary dreamer” of a free Europe
including the forgotten East.
He disliked appeasement policy and any dictatorship while others approved it
as part of Realpolitik.
Whenever he spoke at large conferences of his loved Paneuropa Union - like
in the Kaiserpfalz in my home town Goslar in 1986 - he was speaking
Hungarian as well. The East German Secret Police, the Stasi, started a smear
campaigne against him even in the 1980's. The Stasi understood the threat of
freedom to their rotten dictatorship.
But he prevailed all of his adversaries and his Golden Age started in 1989.
At the Hungarian-Austrian Iron Curtain, the Paneuropean Union, inspired by
him and with the help of his daughter Walburga (now a member of the Swedish
Parliament), launched the “European Picnic” in 1989 in Sopron. The border
fence was cut and 600 East German citizens could flee to the West - the Iron
curtain was opened for the first time. This hole expanded, initiated the
fall of the Warsaw Pact in the East and symbolized the reunification of
Europe. This picnic was his moment of glory and satisfaction, his virtual
Otto von Habsburg proved that he was right to include all Europeans into his
vision of a united Europe of democracies.
His legacy is a united Europe of freedom, justice and Christian values and
the will to advance its development step by step.
He is a role model for freedom fighters all over the world as well as for
Please have a look at visions of Otto von Habsburg in his
WSN TV interviews which have become popular in
WSN TV on YouTube.
Dr. Hubertus Hoffmann
President and Founder
World Security Network Foundation
World Security Network reporting from Islamabad in
Pakistan, July 04, 2011
Dear Cavkic Salih,
Riaz Khokhar, Foreign Secretary of Pakistan from
2002 to 2005 (right), here with Indian
Foreign Secretary Shashank: "The US and ISAF have failed in
Afghanistan and will probably face a Vietnam-like defeat. A
quisling and corrupt Afghan regime has not only failed its
people but has also taken the US and its allies for a huge ride.
All the countries directly bordering Afghanistan, including
Russia and China should also be involved in the talks with the
Taliban, but the US must not insist on keeping military bases in
Afghanistan. The US would also be making a huge mistake in
targeting and killing Mullah Omar, the one person who holds
overwhelming influence over the various Taliban groups, and who
could help in bringing about peace and stability in
Riaz Khokhar, Foreign Secretary of
Pakistan from 2002 to 2005, former Ambassador to China and the USA as well
as High Commissioner to India, discussed with
Dr. Hubertus Hoffmann, President of the
World Security Network Foundation, the nature of extremism, Osama bin
Laden, the Taliban, the army, and politics in Pakistan. Khokhar also
commented on the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan, explained the relation
between India and Pakistan after the Mumbai terror attacks and Islam in
Hubertus Hoffmann: Aatish Taseer complained in a well received
Financial Times article on May 5, 2011: ”There has also been, since
Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, a campaign to silence dissent in Pakistan.
Earlier this year, my father, the governor of Punjab, was killed by his own
guard. The act was put down to the actions of a single man. But later that
week there were vast demonstrations of support for my father’s killer -
rallies of 40,000 and more - and leading them was Lashkar-e-Taiba, a group
created and nurtured by the Pakistani army, which is loath to put it out of
business due to its special hatred of India. Its leader, Hafez Saeed, was
also the man conducting prayers for bin Laden this week. There is such a
climate of fear and violence in Pakistan at the moment that only a fraction
of what happens gets reported.” What is the situation in Pakistan now and
are radicals winning step by step while the majority stays silent?
Riaz Khokhar: Aatish is the son of very notable parents. He is a
brilliant young man and has a great future in the
world of literature. I share his grief
and wish him well.
I knew Salman Taseer, we were class mates in school. He was a fabulous
person, who did not deserve a tragic end. Yes, it is indeed abominable that
some people supported the killer’s act, but the large majority of the people
in Pakistan were shocked and saddened by the heinous act. There was no
justification whatsoever for killing Salman Taseer.
Salman Taseer was principally let down by his own political party, the
Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP). The President of Pakistan, also the
Chairperson of the PPP, should have attended Taseer’s funeral, which would
have given the clearest signal to the extremist elements that the President
was going to deal with them with a firm hand. Instead the Prime Minister
attended the last rites, a person who is a political light weight and not
taken seriously by any one, let alone the extremists. After the murder, the
PPP government should have launched an aggressive campaign to deal with the
extremists, but instead it pursued a policy of appeasement.
Extremism has been on the march since the days of President Zia Ul Haq, who
was the darling of the West, especially close to the U.S. Zia’s rule was a
curse for Pakistan, but his patrons were successive US Presidents. It was
the US that had encouraged the Jihadi culture in Pakistan for the struggle
against the Soviet Union. How can anyone forget that President Reagan had
embraced the Afghan Mujahideen leaders in the Oval Office.
One of the principal reasons for the growth of extremism is that the secular
and moderate political forces conceded too much political space to the
extremists. The secular political forces have failed to deliver a social and
economic program the masses of Pakistan, which would bring about a change in
the quality of life of the people. In the last four years the situation has
worsened. More than half of Pakistan’s population (ca. 180 million people)
has fallen below the poverty line. Because of the dire economic situation
and worsening condition law and order, the country is slowly moving towards
an anarchical situation, something the extremists would welcome.
There is no doubt that the culture bred by Zia ul Haq is still flourishing,
including to some extent in the Armed Forces. The infection in the army is
limited and is being rooted out.
The best and most effective way to deal with extremism is not through
military means, but by presenting to the people of Pakistan a more powerful
and promising message of hope. This is the responsibility of political
parties. Today, Pakistan has the poorest and most incompetent political
leadership, which is incapable of providing good governance. If this
political dispensation continues, radicalism will gain strength.
Hubertus Hoffmann: Taseer continued on Osama bin Laden: "Let us be
clear about what happened last week: Osama bin Laden was not just found
living in Abbottabad, there out of some inverse logic of his own. He was
found in this garrison town because he was the guest of the army. And now
the charges against this army and its agencies are manifold". When asked for
his opinion by the World Security Network Foundation, a respected head of a
Western intelligence agency stated: "The Director of the ISI and the Chief
of Staff indisputably knew about Osama bin Laden's residence, while a
separated group of the ISI was in charge. They feared that to hand him over
to the U.S. and having him imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay would produce an
outcry in Pakistan. Moreover, they could have continued to ask for more
support by the US against Al Qaeda". The Pakistani Parliament condemned the
killing of bin Laden as well as the air strikes against terrorists in the
tribal areas. Is the military playing a double game with the US and the
West? What is Pakistan's position?
Riaz Khokhar: Yes, indeed Osama was found in Abbottabad, which is
strictly speaking not a garrison town. The town hosts the Pakistan Military
Academy, which is the equivalent to Sandhurst in England and West Point in
the US. No combat or special action troops are stationed in Abbottabad.
The jury is still in the dark about who knew about Osama’s presence in
Abbottabad and who provided him the support system. Without a doubt, the
government of Pakistan has to investigate and provide credible answers to
very valid and critical questions. To date, it is a matter of record, that
the President of the United States and some seniors officials have implied,
that government leaders and senior official in Pakistan were not aware of
Osama’s presence in Abbottabad. Clearly, Osama had some support system,
probably provided by some extremist groups, which were linked to Al Qaeda.
Pakistan has conceded that we have to satisfy the international community on
a host of issues arising from the Abbotabad incident.
Osama was not living in a $ 10 Million mansion or a state owned safe house.
From the TV clips and films it is evident, that he was living in penury and
squalor. There were no security guards to protect him. The 79 Navy Seals
actually killed an unarmed Osama. There was no exchange of fire. He was not
surrounded by scores of highly trained loyal guards as was the ten years old
myth created by the western media. It would have been better if he had been
captured alive, and faced a trial, for the world could have discovered the
truth about the attack on the US in 2001. Osama”s burial at sea was also
controversial as it raised many questions.
Hubertus Hoffmann: Concerning Afghanistan, some in ISAF and Kabul
blame the Pakistani Army to play both sides of the fence, including secret
support for the Afghan Taliban and protection of the Pakistani Taliban. What
is the truth?
Riaz Khokhar: The US and ISAF have failed in Afghanistan and will
probably face a Vietnam-like defeat. An illegal occupation force cannot win
against a people that is fighting for the freedom of their motherland.
Afghanistan is a poor country and stands devastated. A quisling and corrupt
regime has not only failed its people but has also taken the US and its
allies for a huge ride. The regime has succeeded in one area, which is
corruption on a monumental scale.
The real test for Afghanistan will come when the occupation forces leave the
country to its own device. There is no military solution to the Afghan
tangle. It has to be an Afghan solution, which reflects the ethnic mosaic of
Afghanistan. Any outside sponsored solution would not work.
Any attempt to divide Afghanistan on ethnic lines, a proposal floated by
Ambassador Blackwell will be a recipe for a civil war. Furthermore, any
attempt to neutralize Afghanistan will not be acceptable to the proud Afghan
people. The US exit plan has no sustainable political solution. It also
seems that the US has no sincere desire to leave Afghanistan. It wants to
retain and use the huge military bases against China, Iran, Russia and
central Asian states. The US has also set its vision on the vast oil and gas
resources of central Asia and the Caspian region. In sum, the US presence in
Afghanistan is a factor of instability in the region.
Hubertus Hoffmann: Should the Taliban again take over control in the
national interest of Pakistan in the Pashtun part of Afghanistan or was this
time of cooperation from 1989 to 2001 more of a burden and disaster for
Islamabad? What is the best design for Pakistan of Afghanistan?
Riaz Khokhar: The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has declared war on
Pakistan. Clearly, the TTP is sponsored by some forces, which are inimical
to Pakistan. The key questions are: who is funding the TTP and who is
providing highly sophisticated weapons and modern communication equipment to
the TTP? It does not stand to reason, that the ISI is supporting the TTP to
attack the Pakistan Army and security forces. The TTP does not enjoy the
support of the tribes in the FATA region. In comparison, the Afghan Taliban
have roots among the people because they are seen as fighting foreign
occupation forces. This is consistent with centuries old Afghan tradition
As for Pakistan, it is not seeking an Islamabad-made solution to the Afghan
problem. Pakistan has to take into account the sentiments of the 26 millions
Pakhtuns in Pakistan and 12 million in Afghanistan. Pakistan cannot afford
to earn the generational enmity of the Pakhtuns for the sake of American
interests. Pakistan would not be able to recover from any military
misadventure in the FATA region.
Hubertus Hoffmann: How should negotiations with the Taliban be done
Riaz Khokhar: The US has no choice but to talk to the Taliban
directly and immediately. The US-Taliban talks at the lower levels,
sponsored by the Germans, are showing some hopeful signs. All the countries
directly bordering Afghanistan, including Russia and China should also be
involved in the talks. If asked, Pakistan can assist in setting up these
talks, but the US must not insist on keeping military bases in Afghanistan.
It seems that the Taliban would give up their links with Al Qaeda and would
not have any problems in renouncing violence, provided the US ends its
military occupation. However, asking the Taliban to accept a highly flawed
constitution makes no sense. The US would also be making a huge mistake in
targeting and killing Mullah Omar, the one person who holds overwhelming
influence over the various Taliban groups, and who could help in bringing
about peace and stability in Afghanistan.
Hubertus Hoffmann: The most influential German Forces, the Wehrmacht,
had some sympathies with the Nazis from 1918 until 1939, but in the end only
proved to be a puppet of Adolf Hitler and his totalitarian Nazi regime.
Hitler promised to revitalize Germany after the shame of Versailles, but in
the end produced 50 million dead, millions of Germans killed and all cities
in ruins - could this become the fate and misperception of the Pakistani
army? Will the terror monsters that it created finally destroy their masters
and its homeland?
Riaz Khokhar: The comparison with Nazi Germany is not relevant.
Pakistan has suffered mainly, because it got sucked into a war against
terrorism, which it had not initiated. The overwhelming view in Pakistan is
that it is not our war. There is a major gap between the opinions of the pro
US government and the majority of the Pakistani people. Pakistan has
sufferered from huge casualty numbers: 35000 innocent people killed, 5000
soldiers and 3000 paramilitary casualties and thousands disabled. Every city
of Pakistan has faced bombing incidents. Pakistan’s economy has endured huge
losses to the tune of $ 68 Billion. No county in the world has paid such a
high price in blood and treasure. The people of Pakistan are asking why we
should make more sacrifices? They are just fed up with the arrogant and
imperialistic attitude of the USA.
Hubertus Hoffmann: Concerning India: is terrorism still a means in
the toolbox of Pakistan? What should be done to ease the Kashmir issue?
Riaz Khokhar: Terrorism is not an instrument of Pakistan’s policy
towards India. The Bombay incident was a horrendous act. It was widely
condemned by the government and the people of Pakistan. There is no reason
to believe that Pakistan will not honor its commitment to carry out a free
and fair trial. India has to cooperate with Pakistan in providing solid
evidence, which will stand up in a court of law. It seems that the judicial
process is moving in the right direction.
As for Kashmir, India is in illegal occupation. It has committed over
700,000 troops to bludgeon the Kashmiris into submission, who are only
demanding the right of self-determination, a right conceded to them by
Pandit Nehru, the first and the most well known Indian Prime Minister. It is
shameful that India has been in gross violation of the UN resolutions for
decades. Why is it that the US and the West have adopted double standards in
regard to Kashmir? Over 100,000 Kashmiris have been killed, several
thousands disabled and thousands of women raped. Human rights violations are
rampant, but the international community is blind to the happenings in Jammu
and Kashmir. It is a reality that India has failed in suppressing the will
of the people of Jammu and Kashmir over six decades even with the help of
several hundred thousand troops. Today, Kashmir is one huge armed military
Timor got its independence through the right of self-determination, because
the population was Christian. Similarly, South Sudan is being created and
given independence, because the population is Christian in large parts. Why
is it that the people of Jammu and Kashmir are not being allowed to exercise
their right of self-determination? India claims to be largest democracy in
the world and yet it is afraid of giving the Kashmiris the democratic rights
to determine their own future. Pakistan would accept any solution that is
acceptable to the people of Jammu and Kashmir as long as they are able to
exercise their right in a free and fair manner without the presence of
Pakistan and India should sit across a table and find a peaceful solution to
the oldest problem at the United Nations. War is neither an option for India
nor for Pakistan, both have nuclear capabilities. Pakistan would like to
live in peace and harmony with India. Our salvation lies in peace and
stability, enabling both countries to divert precious resources to cater for
the well-being of the teeming millions who are living in abject poverty.
Hubertus Hoffmann: Why do so few openly and aggressively defend the
Prophet and the Koran against radicals? The true teaching of Islam is peace,
understanding and tolerance towards Christians and Jews - why do we hear
almost nothing to oust the extremists, why do the the totalitarian preachers
of hate control the media and public attention? Is the silent majority in
Pakistan paralyzed and scared or full of cowardice?
Riaz Khokhar: The majority of the people of Pakistan are deeply
committed to Islam, but are moderate Muslims who firmly believe in and
revere the Holy Quran and love and adore the Holy Prophet. The bulk of the
people of Pakistan are too preoccupied with the daily life in search of
bread and butter issues. They are also concerned about extremism and deplore
acts of terrorism. The civil society in Pakistan has been at the forefront,
challenging the wrongful interpretation of the Koran and promoting the true
spirit of Islam.
Islam is a religion of peace and emphasizes respect for other religions.
Muslims hold all Prophets in high esteem and accept them without any
prejudice. Tolerance and understanding should guide people of all religions
for the world to become a harmonious place.
The reality is ugly. Muslims have been massacred following the breakup of
Yugoslavia. Over a million Iraqi’s died in a war which was based on utter
lies and deceit. 500,000 Afghans have been killed in a war for which they
were not responsible. The Islamic world is faced with many problems begging
for solutions, namely the Arab-Israel problem, the Kashmir problem between
India & Pakistan and several other issues. Today, Western countries are
interfering in some Arab countries on the basis of highly dubious principles.
There are some hardliners in the US who are suggesting that the US should
also take military action against Syria and Iran.
There is immediate need for a serious dialogue between the Islamic World and
the West, to develop a harmonious working relationship for the sake of
Dr. Hubertus Hoffmann
President and Founder
World Security Network Foundation